Videogum Home - inspired by Guilherme Rosa's work in the colors issue of Idea Fixa
June 9, 2008

The Hunt For The Worst Movie Of All Time: The Fountain

After watching Death Sentence, a terrible movie starring Kevin Bacon as a father in search of vigilante justice directed by Saw's James Wan, Gabe embarked on The Hunt For The Worst Movie of All Time. This is his sad journey.

While Darren Aronofsky's film The Fountain may be many things to many people, I can tell you what it is not: it is not the Worst Movie of All Time. It may be an odd, pretentious bit of adolescent poetry written on celluloid jeans, but have you seen Baby Geniuses? This movie was recommended for inclusion in our Hunt by one Lindsay Robertson, so take it out on her. But to be fair, I had heard that it was horrible from others as well, so take it out on others, too. And while we cannot seriously consider this one of film's greatest mistakes, it's definitely not very good, so there's that.

The Fountain is so aggressively "unusual" that I'm not sure it has a plot. It centers around a tragic love story played out in three different time periods. There's the contemporary love story in which Hugh Jackman plays a scientist who is conducting experimental surgery on monkeys to cure brain tumors. He is in love with Rachel Weisz, a writer who's terminally ill. Then there is the past love story in which Hugh Jackman is a conquistador to Rachel Weisz's Spanish Queen, and then there is the future story, in which Hugh Jackman is a bald pre-cog in Holocaust pajamas and Rachel Weisz is a CGI tree, traveling together in an indestructible magic bubble to outer-space? Think Sliding Doors meets Project X meets a Jamiroquai video.

Since plot has been eliminated, the movie's main engine of progression is visual and dialogic leit motifs. There is the surgery lamps/candelabras/solar systems leit motif, and the "let's go walk in the snow" leit motif. And then there is my favorite leit motif, the gross sentient hair leit motif.


Once gross.

Still gross.

Will always be gross.

While the movie is visually interesting and even has some decent moments in it, it's less Jorge Luis Borges and more M.C. Escher. It's the type of pathos and philosophical musing that belongs in college dorm rooms, over a round of mini-fridge-chilled Natty Lites. When the only reason that you know that a character is worth loving--in this case Rachel Weisz--is because another character says "She's amazing," it's hard to get invested. "At first I thought she was just a poorly drawn two-dimensional stereotype of the terminally ill muse to a tortured and therefore more important man. But then I was told she was amazing. Your movie has touched me, sir."

Not to mention the comprehension problems. I'm all for interpretive wiggle-room in my movies, but you could drive a wiggle-truck through the wiggle-holes in this one. For example, the past-life storyline in which Hugh Jackman is a Spanish conquistador is actually the plot of a book that the terminally ill Rachel Weisz is writing? So that means it's just a metaphor? But then what is up with BALD HUGH JACKMAN IN PAJAMAS FLOATING INTO SPACE WITH A TREE INSIDE A MAGIC BUBBLE? According to wikipedia he is traveling through space in an ECOSPEHRIC STARSHIP. Oh duh. I can't believe I didn't realize that he was traveling through space in an ecospheric starship the whole time. I'm so fucking stupid.

I do love that Rachel Weisz is writing her novel about a Spanish conquistador by hand?

It's 45 pages long. In Michiko Kakatuni's New York Times review, she wrote "Nope."

Anyway, whatever. I can imagine that someone likes this movie. It's the Must Love Dogs for someone who took too many semiotics classes in college. Fair Enough. But I don't care how much you love subtlety or visual poetry, this scene made me L out L.

After this he lays down on the ground and SPOILER ALERT his entire body ruptures into a bunch of plants. So, the moral of The Fountain is don't be a magical tree-cum guzzler. Got it.

Next week, we cool it with the things that are just kind of bad and get back to things that are probably The Worst with Southland Tales.

As always make your suggestions for TWMOAT in the comments or in an email. If you have not before, please consult the Official Rules.

Posted by Gabe at 3:30 PM in
Tags:  |  |  |




45 Comments

icanread

Natty Light? Puh-lease, my college dorm parties had Bacardi and Captain Morgan. But we were also more likely to convince our sober friends to drive us to restaurants than drunkenly discuss philosophy and watch movies.

Posted by: icanread profile link at 06/09/08 3:55 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

Wait, I just saw the new worst movie of all time: Don't Mess With the Zohan. It was so confusingly bad that it hurts to type this.

Posted by: Punky Brewster at 06/09/08 4:10 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

How could this possibly be considered worst movie of all time? Cinematography alone gives the film a 4/10.

Posted by: Joe H profile link at 06/09/08 4:16 PM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down
Gabe

You make a good point. It reminds me of the 500 times in the post where I said it was not the Worst Movie of All Time.

Posted by: Gabe profile link in reply to Joe H's comment at 06/09/08 4:22 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

...And yet you included it anyway, when there could easily have been 1000s of worse movies to choose from.

Posted by: Patrick R in reply to Gabe's comment at 06/10/08 8:52 AM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

like Catwoman?

Posted by: Alex in reply to Patrick R's comment at 06/10/08 3:32 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down
smash

Every time Rachel Weisz's character trotted outside to make snow angels or whatever, i prayed she'd get locked out and freeze to death. Her brain cancer took entirely too long.

Posted by: smashleigh profile link at 06/09/08 4:30 PM | Reply
Score = -2 Vote up Vote down

You obviously haven't seen Exterminators from the Year 3000:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085514/

Posted by: Goon at 06/09/08 4:38 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

I'd like to nominate some "movies." First: Boondock Saints. Every drunk Irish (not Irish--American) retard at my Boston area college loved this shit because it was in Boston and had drunk Irish retards shooting guns. It's like if The Departed was written and directed by Paul Haggis.

Posted by: K at 06/09/08 4:49 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down
icanread

Boondock Saints may not be the greatest movie ever made, and Norman Reedus and Sean Patrick Flannery may have hilariously bad Irish accents, but that movie is awesomely badass with great gun-batte-ly scenes. And the scene with the cat... I loled.
If Troy Duffy ever does make a sequel, that will probably be the worst move of all time.
PS, Boondock Saints is only one movie, not "some 'movies'"

Posted by: icanread profile link in reply to K's comment at 06/09/08 6:22 PM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

The fact that Lindsay suggested this explains everything.

Posted by: Max Silvestri profile link at 06/09/08 4:56 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

Aaaaand.... here's the post where videogum loses all credibility with me! Nice job fucking this one up, Gabe.

How fucking dense do you have to be to realize that this film isn't a cohesive narrative? I can't believe you tried to review it as such.

I'd love to see how you tried to make sense out of Waking Life using this "Movie Must Tell Story Like All Other Movie Do" logic. Or, god forbid, you trying to make sense out of any fucking Werner Herzog film not starring Kinski.

Pointless.

Posted by: RJ at 06/09/08 5:10 PM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

Noted. You're very intellectual.
Everyone else shut up now!

Your comment has hereby inoculated the film from any criticism.

Thread over! Circle jerk begin!

Posted by: Rodrigo in reply to RJ's comment at 07/14/08 5:13 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down
MuffinsQ

jesus, even *i* knew it was an ecospheric starship

Posted by: MuffinsQ profile link at 06/09/08 6:34 PM | Reply
Score = 2 Vote up Vote down

Wicker Man HAS to be next........ it's just.... i can't even muster up the words.

Posted by: Becca Baby at 06/09/08 7:26 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

This movie is a forgivable experiment, come on. I wasn't psyched by it but I thought it was a worth-while once-through (the guy directed Requiem, for goodness sake), you are just easily obsessed with your asshole aura you've built up so far. I've never called anyone an asshole on the internet before, so I'm not one of these troll people. You should stop being such a dick to Lindsay at most every possible moment, also.

Posted by: Finchmeister at 06/09/08 9:26 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

May not be worst evs but I highly recommend/don't recommend at all "The Dying Gaul" by Craig Lucas starring Peter Sasgaard, Patricia Clarkson and Campbell Scott. I KNOW HOW COULD THAT BE BAD, RIGHT? Wait until Peter IMs his dead boyfriend in 1995.

Posted by: Cameron profile link at 06/09/08 9:46 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

I would like to nominate Three to Tango, a romantic comedy which features Matthew Perry, tuna melts and vomiting as a romantic leit motif (to steal Gabe's phrase of the day).

Posted by: karen at 06/09/08 11:03 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down
MuffinsQ

what! i loved chandler: the movie

Posted by: MuffinsQ profile link at 06/10/08 8:38 AM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

Dante's Peak.

Posted by: Erica at 06/10/08 11:46 AM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down
aaron

WHAT! No way! that movie should have got an Oscar based on the magic of Peirce Brosman's hair! A volcano was erupting, yet he somehow managed to keep his hair perfect.

Posted by: aaron profile link in reply to Erica's comment at 07/07/08 2:10 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

miami vice.

that movie was the kind of bad that just makes you feel sad and tired. it wasn't even funnybad, it was just unrelentingly, LONG-ASS, earnest terribleterrible bad.


Posted by: caringiscool at 06/10/08 1:33 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

miami vice.

that movie was the kind of bad that just makes you feel sad and tired. it wasn't even funnybad, it was just unrelentingly, LONG-ASS, earnest terribleterrible bad.


Posted by: caringiscool at 06/10/08 1:48 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

The Perfect Storm. Unintentional homoeroticism would probably have made it a BETTER movie.

Posted by: Jared at 06/10/08 8:11 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

You HAVE to take a look at Even Cowgirls Get the Blues. I can't think of any movie that went so wrong in so many ways.

Posted by: MikeS at 06/11/08 1:02 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

I love that there was a "Must Love Dogs" reference in here. Now, that movie sucks. Hard.

Posted by: Laura at 06/12/08 9:17 AM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

Um, did you see 27 dresses? Okay, maybe not the worst of all time but the worst in a long while? Can I get a witness?

Posted by: Elizabeth at 06/12/08 10:24 AM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

You have to check out The Hot Chick with Rob Schneider, unless of course Mr. Schneider doesn't even count as B-grade, or Happy Madison movies are considered "intentionally horrible"...seriously, that movie is the least funny comedy of all time hands down.

Posted by: Joe at 06/12/08 1:27 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

This feature sucks.

Posted by: Chris at 06/12/08 3:15 PM | Reply
Score = 2 Vote up Vote down

wtf ever. even cowgirls get the blues was bangin. underlying female homosexuality? and drag queens? and peyote? and a little asian man.

come on. gus van sant owns your face.

Posted by: morgan at 06/14/08 10:27 AM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

"Leitmotif". One word.

Posted by: Anon at 06/16/08 1:10 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

nominations congo ,eon flux, black snake moan, meet joe black with brad pitt , reign over me , harold and kumar 2 , blair witch 2 , the one with robert deniro and dakota fanning ,night at the roxbury ,but nothing will beat johnny numonic fuck them i want the thirty minutes of my life back that i tried watching that 7 miles of hammered dog shit movie.

Posted by: elvis at 06/18/08 3:38 AM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

this movie sucked so much booty it should be called the booty fountain. your hunt should here...with this movie...today.

Posted by: Matthew profile link at 06/25/08 1:17 PM | Reply
Score = -2 Vote up Vote down

PS

any movie nominated that has Bruce Cambell in it (no matter how minor the role) should be dismissed.

Posted by: Matthew profile link at 06/25/08 1:19 PM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

This movie is worse than baby geniuses.

Posted by: bradpitt at 06/26/08 8:38 AM | Reply
Score = -2 Vote up Vote down

Worst is so subjective also. I think this movie is worse than baby geniuses and lindsay lohan movie because it tried to be something so great. That has got to be worth some points on the worst movie scale.

Posted by: scale at 06/26/08 8:41 AM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

This movie may have lacked in the story telling element, but it was stunningly beautiful. I dont think i blinked the entire 2 1/2 hours.

Posted by: Ty at 06/30/08 6:58 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

depends on the school I think. I went to Columbia and this is right up the alley of 95% of students.

Posted by: adrienne profile link at 07/01/08 4:35 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

agreed on the meet joe black side, but brad pitt already has a special corner of this site dedicated to him...

Posted by: adrienne profile link at 07/01/08 4:39 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

wow, somebody missed the whole fucking point.

this is one of the best movies i've seen in a long long time. it is visually arresting, and the story is intriguing. yeah the past is a metaphor, but the future is the future. sure it gets all sci-fi at the end, but if that means a movie is bad...well...you are lazy. i'd like to know what your best movies of all time are. let me guess, garden state? donnie darko? boondock saints?

let's tear some shit out of donnie darko for once. that movie is so overwrought and pretentious and poorly written and poorly acted that i'm amazed every time i see it on someone's facebook under the "movies" heading. ew.

Posted by: christian at 07/07/08 3:34 PM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

I thought this movie was pretty weird, but beautiful like lots of others and then someone offered an interpretation of the plot that made it seem a million times better for me, the college dorm room kid I guess. So the part she writes, of the past, is how she feels he is addressing her cancer, i.e. running off like a hero but essentially leaving her alone when all she wants is for him to be with her while she is dying - and the future part is what he thinks, that when he is researching for a cure and all that jazz he is actually in that little eco-starship with the tree, i.e. that he is with her the whole time he is trying to save her. To different perspectives on the same event from different genders or people on different sides of the coin. Worth re-watching I think.

Posted by: Nick at 07/09/08 9:14 AM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

i can hardly believe the poor quality of motive for deciding what either makes a good or poor film with regards to the comments above. WHAT ARE YOU ALL? A BUNCH KETAMINE INFESTED Pepsi advert addicts?

When you combine such cinematography with graphic portraits of emotive lurking, subtle hints into other sensory dimensions, intense plot that goes over the head of 99.99% of all who watch the movie matched with one of the best soundtracks Clint Mansel has ever created - you get a movie that may not look that good to most of you, because it wasn't made for most of you, it was made for a discerning eye that can see true creative reflection when it comes around, which my dears, is the exact reason FILM WAS EVER USED AS A FORM OF ENTERTAINMENT, that an propaganda, which is what 'most of you' seem to find worthy of a good review.
PATHETIC! oh wait, this is an American site right?

Posted by: SGGS at 07/09/08 12:48 PM | Reply
Score = -1 Vote up Vote down

I think the reason many people don't like it is cuz they just don't understand it. which has been made abundantly clear in this article. the guy clearly wasn't paying attention. the problem isn't the movie. it's that american audiences go to the movies to be entertained, not to watch a good film. I saw this with 5 other friends and we all loved it.

Posted by: scott at 07/12/08 1:44 AM | Reply
Score = 1 Vote up Vote down

Visually impressive film accompanied by an equally impressive score by Clint Mansell. The movies story was a breath of fresh air to all that other manifactured bollox being churned out today by production companys. I'm not saying the movie as a whole is amazing! It's just different. Different is good. So for that reason alone it cannot be the worst movie of all time.
Now if you want to watch terrible, TERRIBLE movies then look no further than this list of gems i acquired over the years. I Will not take responsiblity for rage that might ensue shortly after viewing! Tough shit.
Throll 2 (It's about Goblins hence the title ;o )

Speed Demons (Megolith! nuff said)

Highlander 2 (Where they took the iconic characters of Juan rafael villalobos ramirez + Duncan McCloud and made them alien criminal refugees from the planet Zoist! No thanks.)

Locust the eight plague.

Mean guns

Ghost Lake

deadmans island

Starship Troopers 2

Streetfighter the movie.

Cutthroat island. :(

Indiana Jones 4.

Invaders from Mars (Tobe hooper remake. The cringe worthy acting is intense.)

Half past Dead

Alien versus hunter.

The list goes on but I'd say most have skipped the post by now ;p. But If i get only one person to watch anyone of those movies for the first time, then my job is done here. :)

Posted by: m00ng at 08/28/08 8:35 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down
Angela

If someone first told me that this was a spoof movie, like "Scary Movie" but for for David Lynch-type films [I like Lynch mostly], I would have found it hilarious. I'm going to re-watch it from that perspective, now that it's on HBO.

No I'm not. But the sentient hair tree could be interpreted as seriously awesome gross-out humor.

Posted by: Angelaaaa profile link at 09/11/08 1:16 PM | Reply
Score = 0 Vote up Vote down

Leave a comment


 

Write Us

tips@videogum.com

Search




Sort by:date relevance

Information

  • Contact:
  • About
  • Press
  • Advertising
  • Videogum RSS Videogum RSS XML Icon

Staff

Founder/Editor-In-Chief
Scott Lapatine
Senior Editors
Gabe Delahaye
Lindsay Robertson
Executive Editor
Amrit Singh
Technology & Operations
Jim Jazwiecki
Angela Williams

Facebook logo

All Videogum Posts

Logo by Guilherme Rosa