21 Comments

The lawsuit Woody Allen was bringing against Dov Charney and American Apparel for using his image in their advertising without approval was supposed to go to court today, but it’s been had settled! The only thing left now is a semi-transparent Law and Order episode*, and we can put this whole thing behind us. From the AP:

Woody Allen agreed Monday to a $5 million settlement in his lawsuit accusing a trendy clothing company of using an image parodying him as a rabbi without his permission.

Both sides announced the settlement — to be paid by American Apparel’s insurance company — on the morning a trial was to start in federal court in Manhattan.

Reading from a statement outside court, Allen said he hoped the outcome “would discourage American Apparel or anyone else from ever trying such a thing again.”

Right. Because of how people are constantly trying to use Woody Allen’s image to sell their products without his permission. Pepsi is like “why didn’t we think of that?” If you trample the rights of one Woody Allen, you trample the rights of all the Woody Allens (or is it Woodies Allen?). Woody Allen is the Rosa Parks of Woody Allen rights**.

*Ripped from the headlines: a Jewish heiress is found impaled to death on a billboard without her consent.

**Obviously, Woody Allen was correct to sue and he deserved to win, but relax, “trailblazerforcivilrightsjeremy.”

Tags: , , ,  

Related Posts:

That's Your Videogame: Muscle March
The Slumdog Price Is Right
Comments (21)
  1. I’m gonna miss all Nike’s “Witness” ads with Woody.

  2. Wow. You guys are kind of huge dicks. You know they only brought up a bunch of shit from his past to try and scare him out of the suit and essentially they tried to publically embarass him.

    You know what, fuck this stupid ass site. If I wanted to here people who haven’t accomplished a single thing of any actual worth in their life rip on Woody I’d go sit in on a Film Studies class.

  3. Woody  |   Posted on May 18th, 2009

    So the reason he shouldn’t have sued is because no one else would use his image anyway? I’m confused. You better open a window it’s getting snarky in here.

  4. Heavens to Betsy that guy is upset about Woody Allen related issues!

  5. Woodies Allen – that’s the accepted plural form, I believe.
    this from someone who can’t decide if the past tense of blow-drying is BLEW-DRY, BLOW-DRIED, or BLOWN-DRY. (twss?)

    also – relax, “trailblazerforcivilrightsjeremy” = hilarious, but dangerously close to shark jumpage.
    in that vein, i’m going to go have fun at dinner now.

    • I get around it by going, “My hair? I just blew it dry.”

      I don’t know how that translates to our Woody problem [is what she said], but that’s all I got. That’s my skill set right there.

  6. Woody’s apparently just determined to be at the forefront of right-of-publicity law — back in 1985 he sued a video rental chain over using a drawing that kinda looked like him in its ads. Woody wants to be the only Woody in town.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post, reply to, or rate a comment.