From Roger Ebert’s Step Brothers review (via Vulture):
Sometimes I think I am living in a nightmare. All about me, standards are collapsing, manners are evaporating, people show no respect for themselves. I am not a moralistic nut. I’m proud of the X-rated movie I once wrote. I like vulgarity if it’s funny or serves a purpose. But what is going on here?
The children of Darfur agree.
![]()
Said one child, “I don’t know which nightmare will end sooner, the genocidal violence in my country, or Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly’s reluctance to make a mature and thoughtful comedy that doesn’t rely on their intellectually lazy and well-tread fart schtick. What is this? Oh, a land mi–”
Leave a Reply
Sign inSign in with FacebookYou must be logged in to post, reply to, or rate a comment.



























I don’t get it.
Is the joke that Roger Ebert’s critical disgust seems petty and self-involved in the face of world poverty and genocide? If so, doesn’t this all seem a bit dubious on a site that publishes essays probing the nuances of Kevin Spacey’s performance in K-Pax?
I don’t think ‘nightmare’ is a word that deems usage for only serious, non-petty issues. Yes, Darfur is a bigger nightmare than bad comedy, but you should be able to use the word in both situations without being offensive to the world’s larger problem.
is that K-Pax review up yet?